• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
Federal Courts Law Review

Federal Courts Law Review

  • Links
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Articles
    • List of Articles
    • How to Cite Articles
    • Submit an Article
  • Reviews
  • Editors
    • Editorial Board
    • Student Editors
    • Student Editors Archive

List of Articles

No Longer A Second-Class Class Action? Finding Common Ground In The Debate Over Wage Collective Actions With Best Practices For Litigation And Adjudication

Scott A. Moss & Nantiya Ruan, No Longer A Second-Class Class Action? Finding Common Ground In The Debate Over Wage Collective Actions With Best Practices For Litigation And Adjudication  11 Fed. Ct. L. Rev. 26 (2019) 

Recovering Ediscovery Costs As A Prevailing Party: Planning Today To Improve Your Chance Of Returns Tomorrow

Kevin F. Brady & Michael C. Kearney, Recovering Ediscovery Costs As A Prevailing Party: Planning Today To Improve Your Chance Of Returns Tomorrow  11 Fed. Ct. L. Rev. 1 (2019) 

A New Solution To An Old Problem: Limited Use Immunity As A Better Alternative To Miranda’s Procedural Safeguards

Carrie Leonetti, A New Solution To An Old Problem: Limited Use Immunity As A Better Alternative To Miranda’s Procedural Safeguards  10 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 127 (2018) 

Lessons Learned From Retroactive Resentencing After Johnson And Amendment 782

Caryn Devins, Lessons Learned From Retroactive Resentencing After Johnson And Amendment 782 10 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 39 (2018)

The Unanimity Rule: “Black Swans” And Common Questions In Flsa Collective Actions

Allan G. King and Andrew Gray, The Unanimity Rule: “Black Swans” And Common Questions In Flsa Collective Actions 10 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 1 (2017)

Neutralizing The Stratagem Of “Snap Removal”: A Proposed Amendment To The Judicial Code

Arthur Hellman, Lonny Hoffman, Thomas D. Rowe, Jr., Joan Steinman, and Georgene Vairo, Neutralizing The Stratagem Of “Snap Removal”: A Proposed Amendment To The Judicial Code. 9 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 103 (Summer 2016) 

Tightening Twiqbal: Why Plausibility Must Be Confined To The Complaint

Justin Rand, Tightening Twiqbal: Why Plausibility Must Be Confined To The Complaint. 9 Fed. Ct. L. Rev. 79 (Spring 2016)

A Judge By Any Other Name? Mistitling Of The United States Magistrate Judge

Ruth Dapper, A Judge By Any Other Name? Mistitling Of The United States Magistrate Judge. 9 Fed. Ct. L. Rev. 1 (Fall 2015)

A Practical Guide To Achieving Proportionality Under New Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 26

Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte and Jonathan M. Redgrave, A Practical Guide To Achieving Proportionality Under New Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 26.9 Fed. Ct. L. Rev 20 (Fall 2015)

Patterns And Trends In Federal Pro Se Defense, 1996-2011: An Exploratory Study

Jona Goldschmidt and Don Stemen, Patterns And Trends In Federal Pro Se Defense, 1996-2011: An Exploratory Study. 2015 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 8 (June 2015)  

  • « Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • …
  • Page 9
  • Next Page »

Copyright 2019 Federal Courts Law Review | Web services by TAG Online, Inc.

MENU
  • Home
  • Articles
    • List of Articles
    • How to Cite Articles
    • Submit an Article
  • Editors
    • Editorial Board
    • Student Editors
    • Student Editors Archive
  • Reviews
  • Links
  • Copyright Policy
  • Contact