Arthur Hellman, Lonny Hoffman, Thomas D. Rowe, Jr., Joan Steinman, and Georgene Vairo, Neutralizing the Stratagem of “Snap Removal”: A Proposed Amendment to the Judicial Code. 9 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 103 (Summer 2016)
Justin Rand, Tightening Twiqbal: Why Plausibility Must Be Confined to the Complaint. 9 Fed. Ct. L. Rev. 79 (Spring 2016)
Ruth Dapper, A Judge by Any Other Name? Mistitling of the United States Magistrate Judge. 9 Fed. Ct. L. Rev. 1 (Fall 2015)
Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte and Jonathan M. Redgrave, A Practical Guide to Achieving Proportionality Under New Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26.9 Fed. Ct. L. Rev 20 (Fall 2015)
Jona Goldschmidt and Don Stemen, Patterns and Trends in Federal Pro Se Defense, 1996-2011: An Exploratory Study. 2015 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 8 (June 2015)
Judge George C. Hanks, Jr., Searching from Within: The Role of Magistrate Judges in Federal Multi-District Litigation. 2015 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. (April 2015)
Hon. John M. Facciola and Phil Favro, Safeguarding the Seed Set: Why Seed Set Documents May Be Entitled to Work Product Protection 2015 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 8 (February 2015).
Maura R. Grossman and Gordon V. Cormack, Comments on “The Implications of Rule 26(g) on the Use of Technology-Assisted Review.”2014 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 1 (July 2014).
Scott Dodson and Colin Starger, Mapping Supreme Court Doctrine: Civil Pleading, 2014 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 1 (April 2014). See video presentation from which this essay was adapted.
Karl Schieneman & Thomas C. Gricks, The Implications of Rule 26(g) on the Use of Technology-Assisted Review with a Foreword by Paul W. Grimm, United States District Court Judge, 2013 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 7 (November 2013)